{"id":117226,"date":"2019-07-30T17:47:52","date_gmt":"2019-07-30T09:47:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seo-hacker.com\/?p=17226"},"modified":"2023-08-08T11:40:21","modified_gmt":"2023-08-08T03:40:21","slug":"e-a-t","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seo-hacker.com\/e-a-t\/","title":{"rendered":"Everything You Should Know About E-A-T"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"What<\/a><\/p>\n

Expertise, Authority, and Trust, or better known as E-A-T is now a famous standard that SEOs try to follow. Two of the biggest algorithm updates from the past year gave more attention to E-A-T, the Medic Update on August 2018 and the Google June Broad Core Update on June 2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

Many of the websites that were hit were said to have low E-A-T. When asked how can they recover, you\u2019ll probably get the same answer from experts and even from Google\u2019s Search Liaison Danny Sullivan over and over again.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"Google\u2019s<\/p>\n

Great content. Something that everyone is trying to do but a few is able to achieve. When someone says \u201ccreate great content\u201d, it\u2019s honestly not much of an advice, but in this tweet from Danny Sullivan in 2018, he referred to the Google Quality Raters Guidelines that talked about what we call today as E-A-T.<\/span><\/p>\n

In this article, I\u2019ll be taking a deep dive into E-A-T to better understand what really does Google mean by great content and how do they judge it and a bit of historical background to how it all started.<\/span><\/p>\n

Google+ AuthorRank<\/span><\/h2>\n

Do you remember AuthorRank? If you\u2019ve been doing SEO since 2012, then you\u2019ve probably heard of it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Back in 2013, <\/span>I wrote an article on AuthorRank<\/span><\/a>. It was the time when lots of false and spam content was circulating around the internet and Google had to take steps to better identify real content from real authors. At the same time, Google also released Google Authorship where the name and icon of the author appear along in the search results.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Google+<\/p>\n

AuthorRank pulled up data of webmasters from their Google+ profile. Before, you can add a short authorship markup rel=\u201dauthor\u201d where you can link your Google+ profile to the content you publish on your website. It was a popular on site optimization factor before. But as you know, <\/span>Google+ has shutdown <\/span><\/a>but if you are interested in checking this out, you could take the time machine and read this post on <\/span>Google Authorship Markup in 2012<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

So why did I bring this up? In my opinion, AuthorRank is one of Google\u2019s stepping stone in coming up with E-A-T. It touches on the importance of having a good online reputation, far different from technical SEO factors like links and meta tags. At least we know that E-A-T is a long time coming. Since the boom of AuthorRank in 2012, Google has been trying to find a better correlation between good content and a good author.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There were different ways to measure AuthorRank before. One of which was on how many +1 you received in Google+ and how many people add you in their <\/span>Circles<\/span><\/a>. Social media presence was also a factor and of course, backlinks.<\/span><\/p>\n

Google ended their 3-year experiment with Authorship in 2014 but many said that AuthorRank is still alive.<\/span><\/p>\n

Google Medic Update<\/span><\/h2>\n

In early August 2018, just a month after Google announced the revised version of the QRG, a huge core algorithm update was released. Many websites reported that they were hit hard. Most of those are health\/medical websites hence the name <\/span>Google Medic Update<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Panic was in the air. Webmasters here and there were asking \u201chow can we recover?\u201d. But apparently, there was no \u201cfix\u201d. Then, E-A-T took the spotlight.<\/span><\/p>\n

Marie Haynes, an expert Google Algorithm Changes and E-A-T<\/span><\/a>, pointed out the qualities of the website that were hit does not adhere to E-A-T standards. In her example, an author named Bridget Montgomery wrote a review of Top 10 Glucose Meters. However, when you go to the author\u2019s profile, there were no information that the author is an expert in the medical field, just a list of articles she published.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Marie<\/p>\n

Even though many websites were hit, Marie also pointed out that there were websites in the same niche that had these qualities have gained:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Clear identity of authors of the articles<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Main purpose of website content is to inform not to sell<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Lots of signs of authority such as comments and reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Because of correlations such as these, people started theorizing that E-A-T is a ranking factor. Many counted out this theory, however, <\/span>in another post by Marie Haynes<\/span><\/a>, she pointed out that a whitepaper that Google published in February 2019 on their <\/span>fight against disinformation<\/span><\/a> confirms that E-A-T is indeed a ranking factor.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Google Quality Raters Guidelines<\/span><\/h2>\n

    In 2015, Google released the full version of the Quality Raters Guidelines or QRG that contain the criteria in evaluating a website hence called the \u201c<\/span>Google Quality Raters Guidelines<\/span><\/a>\u201d. It was revised in June 2018 and was last updated on May 2019.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

    To help evaluate each website on its index, Google contracted more than 10,000 employees to evaluate pages that appear in the search results especially those in the top pages. They are called the \u201cQuality Raters\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \"Google<\/p>\n

    Quality Raters cannot directly affect a website\u2019s rankings. When a page is given a low-quality score, it does not lose all of its rankings and traffic overnight. However, the data from Quality Raters are used for further improvements in Google\u2019s search algorithm.<\/span><\/p>\n

    The QRG taught Quality Raters on the factors they need to consider when judging a page\u2019s Page Quality (PQ). It talks about reputation, quality of a page\u2019s main content, samples of low-quality pages, and of course, the E-A-T.<\/span><\/p>\n

    In section 3.2, the QRG first mentioned E-A-T. It said that websites or pages the don\u2019t have any purpose or benefits for users should receive the lowest Page Quality (PQ) rating. However, for those websites or pages that provide value to users, the amount of E-A-T is important and Quality Raters should consider the following:<\/span><\/p>\n